Warm up a creaky old house

Warm up a creaky old house – for free
Now you can roll the costs of tightening up a drafty home into a mortgage, save on your monthly utility bills – and then take a tax credit.


Think a thick sweater and dialing down the thermostat are the only ways to save on a budget-busting winter heating season?

A relatively unknown financing option called the "energy efficient mortgage" might help you keep your home cozy as well as keep the bills down. And after the first of the year, Uncle Sam will even kick in incentives, in the form of tax credits, for home energy improvements.

Created by Fannie Mae, the EEM dates back to the Carter administration, though the program was updated in 2002. The tax credits are included in the 2005 energy bill.

With an energy efficient mortgage, a home is inspected and scored by a certified energy rater for about $300.

Then, the cost of improvements, such as a new furnace, more insulation or newer windows that would improve the score, is rolled into the loan.

Even though mortgage payments are higher, lower utility bills result in a home that is cheaper to operate. Lower monthly bills also enable the homeowner to qualify for a larger mortgage.

A double bonus for homebuyers
Michelle Desiderio, senior product developer at Fannie Mae, thinks the energy bill and the energy efficient mortgage program can work together for the benefit of homeowners.

Under the new energy bill, homeowners can also claim a tax credit of 10% of the cost of certain energy improvements, up to $500 total. Homeowners who install solar technology get more generous credits: 30% of the cost, up to $2,000. Such tax credits, which can be claimed on 2006 and 2007 tax returns, can be considered as additional income in loan qualification, Desiderio says.

"There's a great market impetus as a result of this new energy bill," she says. "If you're looking to buy a home next year, you could look to an EEM either for purchase or refinance and get the double benefit."

"It's a good marriage for existing homes," says Steve Baden, executive director of RESNET, a national organization of home-energy raters.

Last fall, Imelda Ramirez and her husband Felipe Lopez used an EEM to finance the purchase of their Lansing, Mich., home. The main energy improvement was a dual-fuel furnace, which switched between gas and electricity, depending on which was the most efficient. Ramirez said last winter's heating bills never even got into three digits.

The furnace and other improvements added $5,000 to the couple's mortgage. But they expected to net an annual savings of $740 thanks to the lower utility bills.

"We were really pleased at what we were paying in comparison with what other people were paying," says Ramirez.

An expensive winter ahead
Joel Wiese is a mortgage broker at Indigo Financial in Lansing, Mich., who specializes in EEMs. He handled the Ramirez-Lopez mortgage last year. Since Hurricane Katrina, Wiese said he's seen an increase in inquiries about EEMs from both home buyers and builders -- and not just from gung-ho environmentalists who would be attracted to an EEM in any case.

It seems there's a higher percentage than of average people who are thinking about it," he says. "Americans don't change until they feel pain, and this is going to be a painful winter on heating bills."

Imelda Ramirez says she's grateful that her family made their energy improvements with the EEM, given the grim outlook for energy costs.

"Just looking at the numbers, if it does go up 40%, that's something we can support. I'm just not worried about it," she says.

To encourage customers to check out the EEM, Wiese says his office is considering offering a challenge to customers: He'll pay closing costs if they don't save money.

"We feel pretty confident we can do it in every case," he says.

EEMs are available as fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgages. Buyers can also refinance their current loan with an energy efficient mortgage. While interest rates generally remain low, buyers should run the numbers to insure that the energy savings will offset the costs associated with the new loan. EEMs typically provide the most savings on older homes.

Look at the fine print
Saving money is in fact a requirement of an EEM. Borrowers can spend up to 15% of the value of the home on energy improvements. They must deliver greater energy savings than the upfront cost.

EEMs are particularly attractive to buyers looking for lower-priced properties, either as buyers or investors. Lower prices usually mean older homes that are typically less well-insulated and are more likely to have leaky windows and doors and inefficient appliances. By fixing those flaws with EEM financing and realizing lower monthly operating costs, a buyer can afford a bigger house.

Also, the cost of the improvements is added to the appraised value, rather than taken out of equity, giving the buyer an immediate stake in the property.

The key with both an EEM and the new tax credits is making improvements that will save on energy costs. Those usually aren't visible or otherwise considered an enhancement to the home -- things like tightening the house with weatherstripping and caulk, adding more insulation, and installing newer furnaces and air conditioners.

New windows are one of the improvements that can make both an aesthetic and functional difference. But the tax credit for them is capped at $200. Other qualifying improvements, including new furnaces, air conditioners and water heaters, are capped at $300.

"I think everybody should get their $500," says Ed Pollock, team leader in residential building research at the Department of Energy. But since homeowners still are on the hook for 90% of the improvement cost, "People need to be intelligent about what they do," he says.

Baden says he expects that the tax credits will spur homeowners to use rater services, in order to decide what improvements are worthwhile.

"The smart homeowner would. It's their money. They're putting up 90% of the cost, and I think it would be well worth it for a smart homeowner to see what the best improvement is" he says. "Not all improvements are equal in terms of cost effectiveness."

Tax credits are also available to new home builders, but the bar is higher. A credit of up to $2,000 is available if the home's heating and cooling load is reduced 50%, which must be verified by a third party like an energy rater. That's an aggressive threshold, Pollock says. "The builders I have talked to are not too excited about it."


By Cari Noga, Bankrate.com

Cost vs. Value Trends

This year’s Cost vs. Value results extend last year’s trend toward higher returns on smaller, lower-cost, maintenance-related projects. Siding and window replacement projects once again occupy seven of the top 10 rankings for cost recouped, partly because they are often necessary repairs and involve durable, low-maintenance materials that improve curb appeal, and partly because, at a construction cost of between $10,000 and $14,000, they are among the lowest-priced projects in our survey. The high value of window replacement projects may also indicate that rising energy prices continue to influence remodeling decisions. Although the payback period on replacement windows can vary greatly, in homes with windows more than 15 years old, new windows not only reduce maintenance and boost curb appeal, their higher insulation levels and greater air tightness also improve a home’s energy efficiency.

Remodeling Cost vs. Value Report 2008-09

The results of the 2008–09 Cost vs. Value Report are surprising. A sluggish real estate market, and an increasing number of foreclosures while our survey was in the field this summer, led us to expect that the ratio of a remodeling project’s cost to the value it retains at resale would drop substantially more than the 8.02% (6.1 points) decline experienced in 2007.

What the 2008–09 data show, however, is a slowdown in the decline of the average cost-value ratio across all projects to only 3.86%, just 2.7 points down from 2007 (see “Percentage Recouped at Resale” graph).

Even with a mild (2.67%) increase in 2007 construction costs, it seems likely that if house values were plummeting as far and as fast as media reports would have us believe, the Cost vs. Value results should have been much worse. Instead, these results suggest that instances of steep home-value depreciation occurring in some parts of the country, particularly those with widespread foreclosures, have led to conclusions about the weakening of the overall existing home market that, while certainly not unfounded, could be exaggerated.

A new working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) suggests something similar, while making the case that elements of the current housing crisis are overblown. In the 55-page report, entitled “The Foreclosure-House Price Nexus: Lessons from the 2007–2008 Housing Turmoil,” authors and university professors Charles W. Calomiris (Graduate School of Business at Columbia), Stanley D. Longhofer (Director of the Center for Real Estate at the Barton School of Business at Wichita State University), and William Miles (Department of Economics at Wichita State), say that it can be misleading to use the extreme circumstances in a few states to draw conclusions about the country as a whole — at least as far as the relationship between increased foreclosure rates and house-price declines. They conclude that, despite a rise in foreclosure rates throughout the country, just 12 states are projected to see price declines of 6% or more through 2009.

The authors base their conclusions on data from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) house-price index, which they argue is a more reliable, useful dataset than the Case-Shiller Index, to which they compare it in their report. They note that the Case-Shiller Index omits 13 states and has incomplete coverage of 29 states, and they argue that it is biased in favor of more expensive homes. (The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices are published monthly by Standard & Poor’s and Fiserv; a national index is published quarterly.)

Using data for each state going back to 1981, Calomiris, Longhofer, and Miles describe links among five variables: foreclosures, home prices, employment, single-family home permits, and existing home sales. In contrast to the aggregate national market, they believe state-level data make it possible to measure linkages using the frequent ups and downs that occur in state and regional housing markets. By concentrating on states, the authors claim, the study takes into account the effects of widely varying employment growth, an effect that continues to define important regional differences.

“Even under extremely pessimistic scenarios for foreclosure shocks, average U.S. house prices … likely would decline only slightly or remain essentially flat in response to foreclosures like those predicted for the 2008–2009 period,” the authors conclude, adding that “house prices are quite sticky, even in the face of high financial distress.”

Though the authors admit that “unusually tight consumer credit conditions or other factors” could cause steeper price declines than they estimate, they conclude that, “even when one proverbially bends over backwards to inflate estimated foreclosures and take account of ... their effects on house prices, there is no reasonable basis ... for believing that the housing wealth of consumers has fallen or will fall by much more than 5%.

Outdoor Living Areas

As extensions of indoor living areas, patios and decks require accessories that will make these spaces as joyful and attractive as possible.

Outdoor Kitchens add to the real estate value of a home. Consider your cost in outdoor kitchens as an investment. Outdoor Kitchens have become one of the hottest trends in the past 5 to 10 years. Outdoor kitchens can cost anywhere from $ 3000 to about $ 15,000 but they are worth every penny.

The look and feel of an outdoor kitchen depends on your needs and how you would be using it in the long run. Make sure to blend your design with your house surrounding to add to the aesthetic appeal. Three common design of the outdoor kitchen grill island are the basic island, the L shape, and the U spape. These islands form the core of your outdoor kitchen. Accessories and aesthetics can be added as per your tastes.


A pergola gives a deck character and provides a focal point for decoration and
design. Pergolas are great for vines, other climbing plants and hanging baskets.














A deck is a quick and cost-efficient way to gain outdoor living space.
Also a deck is an ideal way to create a level outdoor area on a sloping site. There are many different materials to use. Composite material is generally maintence free, and has many different colors and sizes. Treated and cedar material is a less expensive option. These options are available with matching railings.